<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help Me Understand The Beatles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meade</title>
		<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Meade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoausch.com/?p=769#comment-125</guid>
		<description>The Beatles are horrid band that could not sing even on key, and barely play instruments. Their music in the start was actually decent Pop music- and they didnt act like they were anything special. Then they decided to become &quot;Bigger Than Jesus&quot; and add a lot of pretention and noise and sound effects to their music- which some people regard as &quot;brilliant&quot;- but more intelligent people might just see it the musical equivalent of cats on a fence. Elvis Presley, while he was a tad overrated, at least had some emotion and honesty in his music and he could sing on key and was great performer live. Beatles records belong in the trash can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Beatles are horrid band that could not sing even on key, and barely play instruments. Their music in the start was actually decent Pop music- and they didnt act like they were anything special. Then they decided to become &#8220;Bigger Than Jesus&#8221; and add a lot of pretention and noise and sound effects to their music- which some people regard as &#8220;brilliant&#8221;- but more intelligent people might just see it the musical equivalent of cats on a fence. Elvis Presley, while he was a tad overrated, at least had some emotion and honesty in his music and he could sing on key and was great performer live. Beatles records belong in the trash can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoausch</title>
		<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>geoausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoausch.com/?p=769#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll definitely give Sgt. Pepper&#039;s a listen all the way through. I&#039;m familiar with parts of the album--&quot;When I&#039;m 64&quot; and &quot;Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds&quot; are two Beatles tunes I find listenable on occassion. However, another &quot;hit&quot; from the album falls into a different catergory.

I realize that The Beatles wrote &quot;With a Little Help From My Friends,&quot; but in my opinion Joe Cocker did a much better job with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll definitely give Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s a listen all the way through. I&#8217;m familiar with parts of the album&#8211;&#8221;When I&#8217;m 64&#8243; and &#8220;Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds&#8221; are two Beatles tunes I find listenable on occassion. However, another &#8220;hit&#8221; from the album falls into a different catergory.</p>
<p>I realize that The Beatles wrote &#8220;With a Little Help From My Friends,&#8221; but in my opinion Joe Cocker did a much better job with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppreu</title>
		<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>ppreu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoausch.com/?p=769#comment-123</guid>
		<description>To me it&#039;s a musical progression.  Simple, catchy, pop tunes - in an era that sounded like syrup  - and then with an almost measured progress into to complex, yet reachable tunes in their later years.  If you haven&#039;t yet, please just listen to Sgt. Pepper&#039;s from start to finish.  Don&#039;t forget the times - Late &#039;60&#039;s and some of this stuff had never been attempted in the main stream.

You can pick your order of albums - just remember the times.

---- and Abbey Road is pure genius; still, you must listen to it straight through

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it&#8217;s a musical progression.  Simple, catchy, pop tunes &#8211; in an era that sounded like syrup  &#8211; and then with an almost measured progress into to complex, yet reachable tunes in their later years.  If you haven&#8217;t yet, please just listen to Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s from start to finish.  Don&#8217;t forget the times &#8211; Late &#8217;60&#8242;s and some of this stuff had never been attempted in the main stream.</p>
<p>You can pick your order of albums &#8211; just remember the times.</p>
<p>&#8212;- and Abbey Road is pure genius; still, you must listen to it straight through</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoausch</title>
		<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>geoausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoausch.com/?p=769#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Jon, I look forward to listening to some of the deeper cuts you recommended. I know I should have probably checked into Sgt. Pepper&#039;s years ago and I definitely think that might be starting point.

Your recommendations from Abbey Road also sound really intriguing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, I look forward to listening to some of the deeper cuts you recommended. I know I should have probably checked into Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s years ago and I definitely think that might be starting point.</p>
<p>Your recommendations from Abbey Road also sound really intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://geoausch.com/2010/01/16/help-me-understand-the-beatles/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoausch.com/?p=769#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how I stumbled on this blog.  But, it&#039;s really quite simple with the Beatles.

Either start at the beginning and work your way through.  The White Album only makes sense as a &quot;classic&quot; when you see their progression from start to finish.

But, if you want a kick start - start in the middle with the sweet stuff - &quot;Rubber Soul&quot;&#039;s a good one.  Cause, it&#039;s got the transition between pure pop guys and the weird stuff to come later.  Add the bookends of &quot;Help&quot; and &quot;Revolver&quot; next.  If you like the more innocent stuff - go backwards.  If you&#039;re ready to bridge the gap to the White Album, then you&#039;re ready for Sgt. Pepper&#039;s and Abbey Road.

I actually think Sgt. Pepper&#039;s and Abbey Road are their two best albums.  But, you&#039;re wanting perspective, so start with Rubber Soul.

Rubber Soul highlights
- Drive My Car - Fun pop with those great harmonies
- Norwegian Wood - Pure quiet weirdness
- Nowhere Man - Desperation, detachment, and perfect harmony in 2:44
- Michelle - For my money, as sing-along-able as The Police&#039;s Roxanne.
- In My Life - Always brings a lump to my throat

Next, look at the shear number of monumental tracks they recorded, in essentially just 7 years.

Finally, I think the actual best Beatles song is the 3 song mash-up at the end of Abbey Road - Golden Slumbers - Carry That Weight - The End.  It rivals any classic masterpiece.  Especially for a band that 5 year earlier was essentially still copying Little Richard and Chuck Berry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how I stumbled on this blog.  But, it&#8217;s really quite simple with the Beatles.</p>
<p>Either start at the beginning and work your way through.  The White Album only makes sense as a &#8220;classic&#8221; when you see their progression from start to finish.</p>
<p>But, if you want a kick start &#8211; start in the middle with the sweet stuff &#8211; &#8220;Rubber Soul&#8221;&#8216;s a good one.  Cause, it&#8217;s got the transition between pure pop guys and the weird stuff to come later.  Add the bookends of &#8220;Help&#8221; and &#8220;Revolver&#8221; next.  If you like the more innocent stuff &#8211; go backwards.  If you&#8217;re ready to bridge the gap to the White Album, then you&#8217;re ready for Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s and Abbey Road.</p>
<p>I actually think Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s and Abbey Road are their two best albums.  But, you&#8217;re wanting perspective, so start with Rubber Soul.</p>
<p>Rubber Soul highlights<br />
- Drive My Car &#8211; Fun pop with those great harmonies<br />
- Norwegian Wood &#8211; Pure quiet weirdness<br />
- Nowhere Man &#8211; Desperation, detachment, and perfect harmony in 2:44<br />
- Michelle &#8211; For my money, as sing-along-able as The Police&#8217;s Roxanne.<br />
- In My Life &#8211; Always brings a lump to my throat</p>
<p>Next, look at the shear number of monumental tracks they recorded, in essentially just 7 years.</p>
<p>Finally, I think the actual best Beatles song is the 3 song mash-up at the end of Abbey Road &#8211; Golden Slumbers &#8211; Carry That Weight &#8211; The End.  It rivals any classic masterpiece.  Especially for a band that 5 year earlier was essentially still copying Little Richard and Chuck Berry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

