Archive

Archive for May, 2009

Question for Obama Supporters #1

May 21, 2009 geoausch 2 comments

I’ve noticed that many people scoff at the idea of certain conservatives calling the current direction the Obama administration and the Democratic leadership are headed, “socialist.”

Personally, I think it’s a bit hypocritical for most elected Republican officials to use the term “socialist,” since the past 8 years were filled with government expansion, an idea often closely associated with “socialism.” However, I have no real problem with the semantics of applying the socilaist term to many of the policies being presented by the current administration. While they may not directly mirror the textbook definition of “socialism,” they do contain many of elements of “nationalization” and involve the intervention of the Federal government in the private sector.

It got me to thinking, if any use of the word “socialist” or “socialism”, as it relates to the current administration, will be viewed as simply a pejorative, what adjective, or what form of government, best describes the intentions of this current administration?

A few facts:

The previous administration began a policy of using the Federal government to engage in problems confronting the financial sector, part of the private sector. This policy was continued and expanded on by the current administration, including the use of Federal funds to prop up privately held financial institutions.

One sector, the automobile industry, received a lot of “hands on attention” from this current administration. Depending on where you get your news, this administration either forced one company (Chrysler) into bankruptcy or strongly suggested they consider it. Either way, the Federal government injected itself into the day-to-day business operations of a company in the private sector.

This administration and Democratic leadership has made clear its intentions to pass legislation regarding health care in the United States, specifically involving the Federal government in seeking out solutions for the uninsured or “under-insured.” Again, depending on where you get your news, this administration either wants to completly nationalize the health care industry or it seeks to establish some form of government run health care for those in need. Either way, it appears this administration and current Democratic leadership will attempt to expand the role of the Federal government in the health care indsutry.

While this may not fit your definition of “socialism,” it certainly does not fit the definition of “free-market capitalism.” My question to those sensitive to the word “socialism,” how do we describe these policies. Is there a particular term or phrase you would choose to use?

Searching for the political Cool Hand Luke

May 17, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

In the movie Cool Hand Luke, Luke Jackson serves time in a Florida prison work camp. From the moment he is introduced to the camp, Luke establishes himself as a fiercely independent spirit, challenging the authority of  the prison guards and refusing to accept the heirarchy of power among the prisoners established prior to his arrival.  One of the movies most memorable moments occurs when Luke (Paul Newman) challenges Dragline (George Kennedy), the self appointed leader among the band of prisoners,  to a prison yard fight.

Dragline uses his size and strength to pummel Luke. However, each time Dragline knocks Luke to the ground, he rises back up to take the next round of punches. At first, the other prioners cheer the fight on, but after a while they begin to see the extent of the beating and encourage Luke to either stay down or start bleeding so that the guards will stop the fight.  Luke refuses, rises to his feet and attempts a weak swing at Dragline who picks Luke up and throws him over his shoulder like a sack of potatos. When Dragline puts Luke down, he takes another swing at Dragline’s face. Dragline looks at Luke tells him “you’re beat” and to “stay down,” but Luke rises back up, as Dragline walks away.

Later that night, Luke manages to win most of the money in camp by bluffing his way through a hand in poker. Dragline looks at Luke and makes the comparison of the way Luke continued to fight him with “nothing” to the way he won a big hand in poker with “nothing.” This prompts Luke to issue one of the most famous lines in movie history, “…sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand.” As the movie progresses, we see Luke defy the authority of the prison guards and that of Captain, seeking to escape from both the literal and metaphorical chains they attach to him, refusing to allow the authority of the prison camp establishment intimidate him.

When I think of Cool Hand Luke, I’m reminded of what the Republican Party currently needs. In the current political clime, Barack Obama plays the role of Captain. Indeed, you can almost hear the words, “what we have here is failure to communicate,” coming out of Obama’s mouth. The prison guards represent Obama’s lackeys in the Democratic Party–Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, etc. Dragline represents the current “leaders” in the Republican Party–John McCain, Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham. The other prisoners represent the Republican Party and Luke represents the figure the Republican Party lacks.

Yes, the Republican Party needs their own Luke, someone willing to challenge the authority of the political establishment, someone willing to challenge the Captain and his guards, someone willing to take the punches from those in the Republican Party who will tell him or her, “we’re beat, stay down.”  The Republican Party needs politicians,not with policy, but with swagger. The Republicans need someone to energize their party with their dissidence.

Congressman Pete Sessions (R-TX) understands this, but lacks the eloquence to properly express this philosophy.  Asking a political party to take lessons from a Paul Newman movie is far less controversial than asking a political party to take lessons from the Taliban. I might not agree with everything Sessions says, but I admire his bravado nonetheless. Earlier in the week, Sessions called out Barack Obama, saying that Obama wants to “inflict damage and hardship on the free enterprise system, if not kill it.”  After that remark, members of Sessions own party played the role of Dragline, distancing themselves from Sessions comments, submitting to the authority of the Democratic leadership.

Instead of standing up beside Sessions, lambasting Obama for his contempt of the private sector, accepting the punishment the White House would surely throw their way, the Republican leadership tucked their tails between their legs and said they did not agree with Sessions. They chose to cut and run, instead of staying and fighting.

We have seen this same cowardice since 2000. Every Republican politician has marched in line with the leadership at top. Every now and then, a few Republican politicians will have a moment of clarity and take a stand like Sessions; however, none of them go far enough.

For example, when Sessions made his accusations about Obama’s attempt to “kill” capitalism, he could have launched into a speech against socialism and took a chance to criticize many in his own party. 

The Republicans taxed and spent the past 8 year like there was no tomorrow and tried to force the government in arenas where the government has no business (gay marriage, Terry Schiavo, etc.). Yes, the few remaining Republicans in Congress are just like their Democrat counterparts. In the words of Bon Jovi, “it’s all the same/only the names have changed.” 

As much as I hate the Democratic Party, the Republican Party is actually more puzzling to me. Why is that they continue to push issues that many, if not most, Americans see as products of bigotry and misogyny. You don’t win elections by telling people “we think this group of people should have these rights, but not these.” They’re free to believe that, but don’t try to legislate it.

The best way for Republicans to win elections is to focus on the economy. “I’ll cut your taxes. I’ll decrease regulation of your business. I’ll let you make as much money as you want and spend that money the way that you want. Other than that, do what you want, just remember your rights end at your nose.” 

Instead, Republicans vote with Democrats on raising taxes, increasing government spending, using the government as a vehicle to fix mistakes made by the private sector. Let us not forget, a Republican president started the Federal bail out program. Three Republican Senators voted in favor of the Federal stimulus program. No wonder the Republican Party is at rock bottom, right now, it has no backbone to support it. Hopefully, before too long, the Republican Party will find it’s Cool Hand Luke and throw a wrench in the Democrats plan to turn the United States into a European socialist state.

Texas Rangers fever!

May 15, 2009 geoausch 2 comments

I mentioned in my last piece that I’d look to get back to more political discussion. However, I am not going to overlook the Texas Rangers. They’re playing some really good baseball right now and I’ve caught the Rangers fever.

I mentioned to a friend earlier today that I have never been more excited for a baseball series than the one we begin with the Angels tonight.  It should be a great 3 game series, especially since the Angels are getting healthy. Depending on how things go tonight, we may try to work in some Rangers talk either tomorrow or Sunday.

Until then, let’s just enjoy first place and the games.

Free markets and capitalism Part 1

May 15, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

For me, the NBA season ends when the Mavericks bow out of the playoffs. I’ll devote some time to the Mavs around the draft, but for now, I’d like to get back to some political discussions, specifically something that I have been thinking about a lot the past few weeks.

I find it funny when people attack capitalism and free markets, treating them as the “enemy” of  freedom and liberty. Barack Obama has made this way of thinking chic again, when the opposite is actually true—capitalism and the free markets are the guarantors of freedom and liberty.  Sure, as a young, idealistic college student, it’s fun to think like Mr. Obama, but once you graduate certain realities should start to take shape. 

It’s the free market economic system that allows you the very freedom to sit around and even consider whether or not some third world factory worker is exploited or not. Likewise, it’s the free market system that created and maintains the “middle class” Lefitsts talk so much about (but do so little for). If it weren’t for our free market economic system, you would be farming your own food, raising your own animals, sewing your own clothes and would have very little leisure time to sit around and think.
It’s our free market economic system, which some think exploits our citizens and other countries, that has paved the way for the ambition and innovation that has allowed for the technological innovations that allow you to write blogs, join social networking sites, write and send e-mails.

It’s our free market economic system, which some think exploits our citizens and other countries, that transformed our nation (and world to a certain extent) from a collection of isolated communities into a vast global network, where we are aware of the condition of those outside our own communities. Do you think Cubans are very aware of those outside of Cuba? Does the average Cuban have the luxury of sitting around, thinking about the condition of people in Darfur?

It’s our free market economic system, which some think exploits other countries, that, believe it or not, raises the per capita earnings of residents in Third World countries. Sure, a person working in a sweat shop in Vietnam makes a terrible wage compared to Americans, but compared to other people in Vietnam, they make a better than average wage. 

Law school application mistakes

May 15, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

Previously, I discussed my decision to apply to law school. Most law schools use a similar application (at least the ones I applied to) and LSAC automatically fills in many of the fields based on forms you previously completed.  Recently, one of the law schools contacted me to let me know that one of my answers contradicted information contained in my academic records. This brought to my attention a question that I had misread on every application and set into motion an attempt to clean up a possibly costly mistake.

The contradiction was easily explained, but left unexplained made me look not only dishonest, but also not qualified for law school. I decided to write letters to every law school to which I applied, explain my situation and explain the contradiction. I sent each letter via certified mail, return receipt requested, which came in handy when one of my letters got misplaced at a campus post office. Luckily, the USPS was able to track down the letter via the tracking number and get the letter to the proper location.

I would imagine that mistakes on law school applications are common. Do not let the fact that you made a mistake on your application stop you from getting accepted. The minute you realize a mistake has been made, write a letter explaining the reason for the mistake and supplementing any applicable information. If you discover the mistake after receiving a rejection letter, write the supplemental letter and then draft a letter requesting that the law school reconsider your application based on the supplemental information you provided.

Remember, be honest, explain yourself thoroughly, show that the information you are supplementing actually makes you a more attractive applicant and most importantly, send your letter certified so that you have an official record of the letter.

Mavs season ends

May 14, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

The biggest difference between this year’s playoff exit and the past three is that for the first time in three years the Mavs lost to a better team. In 2006, we were better than the Heat. In 2007, we were better than the Warriors. Though some will disagree, I think we were better than the Hornets last year.

There’s no shame in losing to a team with more talent, only shame in not putting up a fight. Tonight, the Mavs went down, but they went down swinging. They had many chances to fold it up and prepare for next season, but they kept on hanging in there throughout the 4th quarter.

Now, it’s time to move on. The draft will be coming around soon and after that, free agency. With the right one of two moves, this team could be in thick of things again next season. My early thoughts on off season moves:

  • If there is anyway to pull the Chris Paul deal, do it.
  • Draft a 2 guard.
  • Get rid of Erick Dampier.
  • Sign the Birdman

Things I Want to See in Game 5

May 14, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

I’m a die hard MFFL, but I am not delusional. I realize that the chances of the Mavs bringing this series back to Dallas are not that great. However, I still have faith. Until the last second runs off the clock, I’ll continue to believe that there is a chance.

With that said, there are a few things I want to see out of the Mavs tonight:

  • Energy  The Pepsi Center is going to be rocking tonight. The Nuggets have a chance to advance to the Western Conference Finals for the first time in over 20 years and the Nuggets fans are not to happy with anything from Dallas at this time. The crowd will be into this one from the beginning. The Nuggets players are a little bit angry after Game 4 and will come out firing. It’s up to the Mavs to match this energy early and keep it up throughout the game.
  • Less Dampier  I don’t know if it’s his ankle or something else, but Erick Dampier has not had a very good series. He has looked slow and out of place. Personally, I think seeing more of Brandon Bass and Ryan Hollins would be a positive note.
  • JET on the runway  Jason Terry had his best game of the 2009 Playoffs so far in Game 4, in my opinion. A repeat performance would help ease the load on Dirk’s back.
  • Defensive rebounds Sure, a monster dunk or a three pointer will instantly ignite a crowd, but it’s the offensive rebounds that keep the crowds going. Grab defensive rebounds and you can control some of the energy.
  • Transition defense The Nuggets will cause turnovers. When they do, we have to be ready to slow down the fast break.

Dirk v. ‘Melo

May 13, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

Sure, Carmelo Anthony has one bogus game winner in this series, but Dirk Nowitzki is actually putting up better numbers than ‘Melo. These numbers are from today’s Dallas Morning News:

Stats through Game 4 of Dallas/Denver series.

Melo:

PPG:  30.0

Rebounds: 7.5

FG%: .464

3-pt. %: .389

FT %: .854

Dirk Nowitzki:

PPG: 35.0

Rebounds:  12.0

FG%:  .535

3 PT %:  .375

FT%:  .900

 

Dirk Peace

More on the “personality” of the Denver Nuggets

May 13, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment

A lot has been made about the character of the Denver Nuggets team.

As a proud American, I have one picture that sums it all up. Notice, only one player, Chris “The Birdman” Andersen, is saluting the flag during our national anthem.

The Thuggets Disrespect My Country

Thuggish-Ruggish Nuggets

May 13, 2009 geoausch Leave a comment
I’m still baffled at the allegations flowing from the Nuggets camp. Now, this LaLa Vasquez character, whose name sounds more like a character from a Broadway musical,  has reached for the race card out of desperation.

From what I understand, LaLa sat behind the Nuggets bench either near or with Kenyon Martin’s brother. During the course of the game, a group of young Mavs fans started heckling Kenyon Martin–an easy target. This set off a chain of alleged events, including a confrontation with Martin’s brother and the young Mavs fans, the young Mavs fans being kicked out of the game and then LaLa Vasquez having a confrontation with a group of female Mavs fans. Depending on who you listen to, the story is either that the female Mavs fans were shouting racial slurs at LaLa or that LaLa verbally assaulted the female Mavs fans and poured a drink on one of them. In the end, LaLa was escorted out of the game.

Video of LaLa being escorted of the game clearly shows this lady has a temper. It is not hard to believe, after seeing the video, that one of the ladys could have made a remark about her boyfriend (Carmelo Anthony) or his team, setting her off on a profanity laced tirade, resulting in her tossing a drink on one of the ladys.

UPDATE: Here is the story of one of the Mavs fans near the action on Monday night.

Evidently, LaLa has some connection with either MTV or VH1 and is in the public eye. She knew that tape of this incident would get out and she knew that she would have to formulate a story to generate sympathy from her employer.  What easier to generate than sympathy than reaching for the race card?

You’re in a large arena filled with over 20,000 people, even if you can’t back up your claims, no one can officially rule it out either. If someone chooses to question your claim, you can easily label them a racist. It’s a win-win situation for LaLa all the way around.

I don’t know much about LaLa, but I do know about her husband and the company he keeps. Kind of reminds me of that song, “Thuggish Ruggish Bone”:

 Get ready for the Bone…

Birdman Gestures

…and the mo’ thug…

Thug In Bound

 

…busta, you know me as a hustla’!

K-Mart Pleads

 

It’s the thugggish-ruggish Nuggets!

 

Thuggish Ruggish Bone

 

With Dorf the trainer?

Dorf and the Nuggets