Jan
27

The Friday Five

I am introducing a new feature this week to Geoausch.Com–The Friday Five, a sort of “Week in Review” of my favorite things on the Internet. With the State of the Union Address on Tuesday night, this just happens to be a politically heavy week, but that won’t always be the case.

1.  We start out with a piece, “Ailing Economy Needs Self-Interest, Not Sacrifice”, by Jonathan Hoenig, writing for the The Wall Street Journal’s “Smart Money” blog. In it, Hoenig provides the perfect rebuttal to the President’s SOTU polemic, exposing, among other things, the unsustainability of an altruism-based economy.

What results is a society built not on mutual benefit, as with capitalism, but mutual contempt, whereas one is endlessly forced to sacrifice for “the public” with the only hope that one day others will be conscripted to sacrifice themselves for you. Social Security and Medicare are just two examples of this multi-generational feudalism.

Capitalism protects individuals’ self-interest, collectivism kills it. So in a free country, why doesn’t the President simply give his unneeded “hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional income” over to the struggling parent, autoworker or whomever he feels is deserving of it? Why must his sacrifice become a national suicide?

Please, do yourself a favor, visit “Smart Money” and read the full article.

 

2.    While the Republican candidates have been campaigning in the media for almost a year now, the Democrats have been quietly replenishing their war chest in preparations for an expensive general election cycle. I came across this piece by Jeannie DeAngelis on Big Hollywood about the fashion world’s contributions to the President’s reelection campaign. It’s poorly written and extremely biased, but it does illustrate the hypocrisy of the Left. They demonize Republicans for being “wealthy” and “out-of-touch” with middle-class America, yet the world’s most famous wealthy people all seem to be Democrats. Like the article points out, these are all attempts by super wealthy people to sell overpriced goods to a group of consumers that can’t afford them.I have no problem with wealthy people supporting Obama and certainly have no problem with them donating what ever amount they want to their politician’s campaign, but let’s cut the hypocritical bull shit. If any party is out of touch with the middle-class, it’s the Democrats.

 

3.  On a lighter note, looks like Dwight might be getting his own TV show. Writing for DeadlineHollywood, Nellie Andreeva broke a story on Wednesday that NBC is working on a spinoff of The Office that would focus on Dwight Schrute’s beet farm. I don’t know if this is the right move, but The Office needs something. It is definitely getting a bit stale. That said, it’s still one of the best shows on network television and Rainn Wilson’s character is a major reason it succeeds.

 

4.  Americans have been trying to legalize marijuana for nearly one hundred years, so legalization stories rarely register on my radar. However, folks in Colorado are taking a different approach. Instead of marching around shouting “legalize it”, they are pushing a ballot proposition that seeks to “regulate marijuana like alcohol.” This is genius. This way you proponents can compare marijuana to another (successfully) controlled substance, “these measures help us effectively control the consumption of alcoholic beverages and the world hasn’t gone to hell. Marijuana is much safer. Let’s apply the same standards to it and move out of the  Dark Ages.” Of course, the writers at the Times have a much more eloquent way of saying this than me. Check it out!

5. Cyberbullying. We hear a lot about it and it sounds bad, but are some of the measures schools are adopting to deal with it going too far? My good friend Brian Cuban stopped by the NBC 5 studios in Dallas to discuss this issue last night. Some might consider this a shameless plug for a good friend, but I really think Brian has some great things to say about an area of the law that is constantly evolving.

Flashback Friday

My pick this week in “Flashback Friday” is Jeff Buckley’s posthumously release of live recordings, Mystery White Boy. I first discovered Buckley’s music shortly after his untimely drowning. For almost a decade, it was something special I shared with other hardcore music fans. Here was the ultimate independent musician who worked himself up from playing coffee shops in the Village to recording the perfect album. He spent two years touring promoting his perfect album and then died tragically. Hollywood could not script a better rock star story than the life of Jeff Buckley. Mystery White Boy gives you a good taste of Buckley’s original, while also given you a sample of his covers, including the one cover that almost ruined Buckley for me–”Hallelujah”. After the song was used on American Idol, and every Dick and Jane was downloading Buckley’s music, I put Mystery White Boy away, rarely listening to it. Well, this week, I decided to take it out my iPod exile and give it another chance. I cannot tell you how much I missed this album, but word to the wise, the album was compiled using taped recordings, so the quality is not terrific. To get the full experience, listen to it with a good set of headphones or on a good set up speakers. This is one album where it actually makes a difference.

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/27/the-friday-five/

Jan
26

How Thick is Your Bubble?

I’m normally not big on Internet quizzes, but found this one rather interesting. Over the past three years, I’ve had several arguments with my left-leaning friends regarding some of my rhetoric of President Obama’s policies. One of my harshest critics, my best-friend from high school suggested I break out of my “cultural bubble” and socialize with people outside my own socio-economic circle. I don’t claim to be most diverse person in the world–I do live in a part of Dallas known as “The Bubble”–but I am very different from my neighbors. I’m rather proud of my score, proves I’m not monolithic after all.
How about you? How did you score?

How Thick Is Your Bubble?


Score » 10 out of 20 (50% )
Result

On a scale from 0 to 20 points, where 20 signifies full engagement with mainstream American culture and 0 signifies deep cultural isolation within the new upper class bubble, you scored between 9 and 12.

In other words, even if you’re part of the new upper class, you’ve had a lot of exposure to the rest of America.

Quiz School Take this quiz & get your score

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/26/how-thick-is-your-bubble/

Jan
25

A Journey Through President Obama’s State of the Union Address

While I consider myself politically (hyper)active, the divisive rhetoric of both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have soured me on Presidential addresses, so much so that I have not listened to a State of the Union Address since 2002. If you’ll recall, this was the State of the Union address immediately following 9/11 where President Bush used the speech to exploit the fears of our nation and eventually led us into a decade long war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ten years later, President Obama engages in the same brand of political opportunism, but instead of attempting to sell our nation on the prospect of conventional warfare, Obama and his handlers attempted to sell our nation on class warfare. I’m still too cynical to listen to this President deliver the State of the Union, but I’ve found a copy of the transcript and thought I would invite you to read through it with me.

After telling us about his grandparents (maternal presumably), Obama begins to lecture about the American Dream–”the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement”–an inherently conservative principle, which it appears he will frame his entire speech of wealth redistribution on. How ironic!

Before we go any further in his speech, I think it’s important to remember, the American Dream is the AMERICAN dream because it is achieved independent of any government body or elected official.

Obama posits that “we can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.” I think we all want the second example, but we differ on how to achieve it. The President could have used this as the starting point to lay out his plan for prosperity, but individual prosperity is not part of the Keynesian plan, so instead he engages in liberalism 101–create a schism among the populace by trying to convince them that poor people are poor because rich people are rich.

Preach the gospel of income inequality incessantly, when necessary manipulate facts.

For example, in speaking of the collapse of the housing market, Obama remarked “we learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them.” True, mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford them, but what he neglects to tell you is that banks were forced to make loans available to unqualified buyers because of equal housing lending measures. Yes, Democratic leaders are as much to blame for the housing collapse as unqualified buyers and greedy speculators.

As Obama launched into the meat of his speech, he did his best to channel the spirit of the late, great Billy Mays, whose legacy was being able to get people to buy stuff they didn’t really need. Obama attempted to build the case for the need for more government in manufacturing, more government in education, and more government in housing. This brings Obama back to his main thesis. We must punish the rich, so that we can expand the Federal government.

Avid readers of this blog will remember my post from October 9, 2011, “Deconstructing the Republican Worldview“, in which I wrote:

At the core of the Democratic Party’s platform is this innate desire for a radical egalitarian transformation of society, using the Federal government has the instrument to control the transformation. In short, Democrats seek to use the Federal government to create a heaven on Earth, where no one has more money than their neighbor, more material goods than their neighbor, more success than their neighbor, more power than their neighbor, etc. Of course, those in the ruling class would hold all the wealth and power and be able to control us all, but Democrats never have been big on thinking out their ideas all the way through.

Over the past three years, Obama has tried to like hell to implement this “radical egalitarian transformation of our society” and it has failed–miserably–yet he is trying to feed us more of the same. This State of the Union speech should be used by the remaining Republican Presidential candidates to unite behind a common message–government can now fix the problem it created.

Without a doubt, Barack Obama is the coolest man to ever occupy the Oval Office and may well be the most intelligent man to hold that office, but he has proven that outside of academia, he has no real solutions to the problems that face our nation.

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/25/a-journey-through-president-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/

Jan
24

What Mitt Romney’s Tax Returns Tell Us

By now, I’m sure you know that Mitt Romney has released some of his tax returns and every left-of-center media outlet is crying about his effective tax rate, trying to convince Main Street America that we should despise the guy because of his financial success. Barack Obama will certainly use Romney’s tax return as proof that we need a more effective means of wealth redistribution in our country, and to stoke the fires of class warfare.

But what do these tax returns really tell us?

Well, for one, Mitt Romeny is a very wealthy man. Over the past two years, he has reported over $43 million in income. I applaud the man on his success in a down economy.

We also know that he paid over $3 million in taxes each of those years. Yet many who pay no income tax, or known tax cheats like the disgraced New York Congressman, Charles Rangle, will tell you Romney’s not doing enough. Yet Romney has paid every penny that he owes to the I.R.S.

On top of the $6 million in taxes, Romney has also donated $7 million to charity. Now this is what really irks Democrats. The fact that Romeny have given more to private charity, including $4.1 million to his church, than to the Federally run charity we know as the I.R.S.

What this tells me is that over the past two years, through his donations to his church and private charities, Mitt Romney has done more to promote the cause of “social justice”–to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and help aide the sick–than Barack Obama has done in his life of “community organizing” and a the Democrat controlled Senate, which has gone 1,000 days without passing a budget.

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/24/what-mitt-romneys-tax-returns-tell-us/

Jan
23

A Challenge to the Newt Gingrich Supporters

When asked in exit polling about the “most important candidate quality,” 51% of those who voted for Newt Gingrich selected “can defeat Obama.” By contrast, only 37% of those who voted for Mitt Romney selected that choice. Some of Romney’s detractors have tried to use this as evidence that Gingrich is the best GOP candidate to face Obama, but that is not at what this number tells us.

Instead, it tells us only that a majority of Newt Gingrich voters really like their candidate’s odds against Obama. It tells us nothing about the feelings of the Republican base, outliers or political independents. The number still fascinates me, because I cannot believe there are people out there, so blinded by their own political ideology, that they think Newt Gingrich is the Republican’s best shot at beating Barack Obama.

I understand that a lot of Republicans might like Gingrich more than Romney, but again, that’s different than saying he stands a better shot  of beating Obama. We know that in 2012, give or take a percentage points, one third of the electorate will vote for Barack Obama, one-third of the electorate will vote for the Republican candidate, and one-third will be undecided as we approach the election in November. In order to defeat Barack Obama, Republicans must develop a strategy  to winning more independent voters than Obama.

Nothing that Newt Gingrich has ever done in his political career says he has the ability to appeal to independent voters. On the contrary, Mitt Romeny has shown that he can appeal to the independent voter, time and time again. That’s not to say his message won’t tweeking. Romney is going to have to find a way to relate to the middle-class, as most independent voters consider themselves members of that economic class. It’s an anti-prosperity, anti-capitalist argument that Gingrich used to his advantage in South Carolina. In order to combat it, Mitt needs to expose the hypocrisy of Gingrich, in the primary, and Obama, in the general, of launching this argument.

For now, I want to hear from Gingrich supporters. Convince that Newt is our best shot at defeating President Obama.

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/23/a-challenge-to-the-newt-gingrich-supporters/

Jan
22

An Interesting Figure From Latest Presidential Approval Numbers

Out of boredom, I began looking through some poll numbers on Gallup’s website, specifically the Presidential approval numbers. The numbers break down by demographics like you might expect–the more progressive a demographic, the higher President Obama’s approval rating. One number that really stood is the “Married/Not Married” numbers.

For the week of January 9-15, 2012, Obama has a 39% approval rating, which is only a percentage point higher than his approval rating among those who “attend church weekly.” Over the past 9 months, his approval number among married couples has hovered right around the 40% mark, never exceeding 45%.

I can construct logical arguments explaining why 87% of African-Americans approve of Barack Obama and why only 8% of conservative Republicans approve of him, but I’m at a loss to explain the extremely low numbers among married couples. To be fair, I would say that probably only 10% of the married couples I know approve of the President, but our friends tend to skew right of center.

Sure, some of the numbers could be explained by this fact–married couples on average tend to be more conservative than their unmarried counterparts, but a 39% approval rating suggests a much greater disconnect.

Anyone have any theories? Also, does this suggest President Obama is even more out of touch with the middle class than portrayed by the media?

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/22/an-interesting-figure-from-latest-presidential-approval-numbers/

Jan
15

Mavs Minutia – Games 12 & 13

 

  • The Mavericks have posted some rather impressive defensive numbers over the past two games, giving up an average up only 68 points during the home-stand. Last night the Mavs gave a franchise record-low 60 points against the Kings and held them to franchise record-low 25.6% shooting percentage. Neither the Bucks or Kings are championship contenders, but it shouldn’t take away from what the Mavs have done.
  • The Mavs have certainly looked more crisp over the past couple of games. One particular area they have looked especially good in is 3-point shooting, where they have shot 44.7% over the past two games, after an anemic start for the season.

 

 

 

 

 

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/15/mavs-minutia-games-12-13/

Jan
13

Further Proof of East Coast Media Bias

I was browsing ESPN.com when I came across this ad:

I don’t want to be “that guy,” but even simply  implying that Denver is on West Coast in an ad is absurd. Dictionary.com defines “West Coast” as “the western coast of the U.S., bordering the Pacific Ocean and comprising the coastal areas of California, Oregon, and Washington.” Even so, it’s over 600 miles from Denver to the border or Oregon or California. Using that criteria, Dallas would have to be considered part “East Coast” since it’s only a little over 550 miles from Dallas to the Florida panhandle.

This ad serves to strengthen my theory that those living in the Northeast view anything west of the Eastern Time Zone as “West” and have no geographic understanding of the American Heartland or West at all. I’m willing to be there are people employed at ESPN who think Dallas to Denver is probably the equivalent of Boston to D.C. , when in fact it’s almost twice as far.

On a side note, the picture in the ad would be great to use in political literature supporting civil unions.

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/13/more-proof-of-east-coast-media-bias/

Jan
12

Mavs Minutia – Game 11

  •  As we’ve come to expect over the past few years, this regular season edition of Mavs/Celtics felt much more like the playoffs, although the home crowd didn’t get into until late in the 4th quarter. There was a defensive intensity, dramatic shots, and of course Dirk hitting the improbable game winner with his tongue hanging out. The “and 1″ left Dirk 3 points shy of 23,000 point heading into Friday’s home game against the Milwaukee Bucks.
  • Tonight we saw why, even at 38, Jason Kidd is such a valuable part of this team. The Celtics pressure defense pestered the Mavs all night long,  preventing them from every pulling away. As the only pure point guard on the roster, Kidd is much better suited to run the offense in these type of situations. One of the main reasons Dirk was held in check until late in the game was that there was no one able to get him his shots. It’s not a knock on Jason Terry and Delonte West necessarily. The Celtics are one of the best teams in the NBA at defending the passing lanes. You need a guard with Kidd’s elite passing skills to muster any semblance of ball movement.
  • The Mavs improved to 2-0 in the Yi Jianlian era.
  • The Mavs shot 44.3% from the field tonight. They have shot better than 43% in all 6 of their victories, and going back to last year’s playoffs, they are 20-4 when they shoot 40% or better from the field.

 

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/12/mavs-minutia-game-11/

Jan
11

Mavs Minutia – Game 10

  • After arguably two of the worst games of his career, Dirk Nowitzki responded on Tuesday night in typical Dirk fashion, putting up 18 points and 7  rebounds, on 9/10 shooting from the floor and the Mavs were a +42 with Nowitzki on the floor. For the first time really all season, his patented one-legged-fade-away was working to perfection. When that shot is working, Dirk is the most unstoppable scorer in the NBA–PERIOD!
  • Brandan Wright continues to impress off the bench. Though he has yet to play minutes at a pivotal point of a game, he has gone beyond what is asked of him in his current role and has done so in impressive fashion, showcasing flashes of athleticism that go beyond that of Brandon Bass (the player Wright was compared to on his signing) and even that of Tyson Chandler. His alley-oop from the JET in the 4th quarter last night was the most impressive dunk I have ever seen from a Dallas Maverick, including Vince Carter’s from Saturday night. Again, we must temper our excitement. Wright is doing this against the bottom of the opposition’s bench, but we’re beginning to see why the guy was a former lottery pick.
  • I understand the Detroit Pistons are in rebuilding mode and they don’t have a lot to play for this season, but I’ve always thought of their franchise as one with loyal fans who would stick with their team through thick & thin. The attendance at last night’s game looked like a Stars’ game. The announced attention was 10,000, and I know the Palace is a spacious arena, but it looked closer to 5 or 6K from TV. Yet even without the empty seats, including court side seats, the Pistons still set fans on the Mavs bench?
  • Watching last night’s game, I kept on debating whether the Mavs’ defense was that good or if the Pistons’ offense was that anemic. The stats would seem to point to the latter. The Pistons entered the game as NBA’s lowest-scoring team, but scored above their season average and shot a respectable 43.5% from the field. Not to mention, the Pistons’ bench outscored the Mavs’ bench 48-42. However, for the first time all season, we saw the Mavericks execute with a high-energy level on defense and have their most successful night with their zone defense, which was huge in last year’s playoff run. The Pistons’ are a terrible offensive basketball team, but the Mavs defense is improving.

 

Permanent link to this article: http://geoausch.com/2012/01/11/mavs-minutia-game-10/

Older posts «